Friday, December 18, 2009

Week 5 Assignment: Reflection

“If you look back to America in the first third of the last century, you will find the roots of the public education system we have today – a system that is now outmoded for a flat world.” – Thomas L. Friedman

Technological advances necessitate the need for a shift in the nation’s existing educational paradigms. To stay ahead of the trends and produce students who will thrive in the competitive global society, our educational systems calls for innovative and passionate instructional leaders armed with 21st Century knowledge, skills, and tools. School administrators must be at the forefront of all these emerging educational transformations; thus, it just makes a lot of sense to include the study of technology standards (e.g. ISTE and NETS-T) into every principal preparation program in the country. That being said, I am truly fortunate to have been given the opportunity to take a masters program in Educational Administration at a university that undoubtedly recognizes this urgent need.

EDLD 5352, Instructional Leadership, has helped me acquire the essential skills and knowledge required to lead a 21st Century campus. The readings, lectures, and activities I completed throughout the course have exposed me to the key components of the Texas Long-Range Plan for technology, the STaR Chart, the National Educational Technology Standards (NETS), and the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) Standards. After five weeks of intensive study, I can confidently say that I am on the right track in my pursuit to be one of the best educational leaders in the field.

In particular, the readings allowed me to recognize the needs of digital-age students and to identify the social, legal, and ethical issues associated with technology and teaching and learning. I was amazed to find out that there were so many legal issues that I still had to learn and master. At some point, I actually felt overwhelmed especially when I read the article, “Copyright Primer for Administrators,” by Davidson. In this article the author gave an unnerving remark -- “But in the final analysis, it is the administrators who bear responsibility for the actions of stakeholders in all roles of the education environment.” This was a very intimidating statement but the message unquestionably hit home! I felt the urgency to keep practicing my technology skills to diminish my “digital accent.” I certainly do not want to run into problems due to lack of technology know-how. As a matter of fact, I have begun to read a book written by Thomas Friedman, “The World is Flat.” I am also planning to do an in-depth research of the different legal issues concerning technology and its fair and appropriate use.

The assessments I took at the beginning of the course increased my awareness of my personal level of technology competency. This information helped me adjust my perspective of what it takes to be a 21st Century educator and motivated me to go beyond my comfort-zone to learn and to experience firsthand some of the technology applications mandated by the district and the state. Additionally, I was able to examine data from multiple sources which allowed me to create a plan of action that was congruent to the specific needs and demands of the key stakeholders on my campus.

Another highlight of this course was to plan professional development activities and to develop an evaluation plan that would help determine their effectiveness. Since I believe that it takes more than one person to develop an inclusive professional development, I asked the assistance of our Campus Educational Technologist in creating my proposal. I found out that when we allow data from different sources to drive our decisions and make student achievement the heart of our every action, we could never go wrong.

The part where I felt I was really pushed to go out of my comfort-zone was the discussion board activities. At first, I was merely complying. The article “From Compliance to Commitment: Technology as a Catalyst for Communities of Learning” by Marilyn Burns was almost like written specially for me. While I am a strong proponent of technology in the classroom, there were instances when I would do some things just to comply. For example, I felt that the discussion board activity was a little bit too much for me in the beginning. The first two weeks, I posted my responses because I had to. However, as the weeks went by, I realized that I actually enjoyed learning about my classmates’ points of view. Additionally, I paid attention to every detail mentioned in the discussion board and this helped me reflect on my own perspectives about the world we are preparing our kids for. Through this activity, I gained a sense of what an online community of learners really looked like.

My favorite part of the class was creating a blog. I benefited greatly from reading my classmates’ posts and I could imagine how this activity could be an essential part of today’s classroom instructions. In my opinion, teachers need to be strongly encouraged if not mandated to incorporate this open source software in their core-content areas. Advocates of “green earth” would definitely agree that paperless assignments and homework would save a lot of trees and in turn save the earth. In addition, students who have access to the Internet would be able to keep a file of their work they can keep as they move from one school to the next. Most importantly, students can easily collaborate with one another 24/7.

Administrators must also take advantage this Web 2.0 application. School leaders can use blogs to talk about important and exciting events happening on campus. Furthermore, this would be a great tool to discuss current research-base strategies that parents can use with their children at home. Another reason why administrators need to use blogs is to model their expectations – practice what you preach.

Now the big question is: Why do some teachers and administrators not readily plunge into the idea of blogging? One factor I can say to explain this is the fact that some educators are still overwhelmed by all these emerging technological advances. Others are worried about safety and privacy issue. While those who believe that anything published needs to be perfect and grammatically correct are concerned about the errors that their students might have when they post their responses online. On top of these, the issue of inequity almost always comes up when technology is discussed. There are schools with minimal technology and there are a number of students who do not have Internet connection from home. Unless school leaders take the necessary steps to address these valid concerns, blogging would remain an arena for the few and “privileged” learners.

I am in a wonderful position to help transform our educational system. I must continue to hone my craft to be the 21st Century school leader that our nation calls for to reclaim its glorious status in the global economy. High-tech devices are only tools. We need educators who have the knowledge and skills to man and operate these devices to maximize their use. I have the capacity to affect other educators so that they too would feel the urgency to make a change in their current practice and to embrace the new digital landscape.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Week 4 Assignment, Part 3: Evaluation of Action Plan

BCS envisions classrooms to be a place where students can obtain the information they want, when they want it, and have the equipment and guidance to use that information in ingenious and distinctive ways. In order to create a visionary curriculum that includes multiple presentation and organization methods for assignments, production of desktop videos, and produce students that are skilled in the use of the Internet and other high-tech devices, a campus technology team needs to be established. Our communication system must continuously allow our students to be able to network with libraries, museums, and classrooms all around the world. Our teachers, students, and parents must have online access to assignments, records, and school information.

BCS is blessed to have been given the opportunity to acquire a state-of-the-art Infrastructure for Technology. Our classrooms are 100% connected to the Internet. We have over 150 laptops; two wireless laptop carts; and two fully equipped multimedia labs with PC's, iMacs, laptop computers, video production, printers, scanners, and editing equipment. These interactive multimedia and telecommunications technologies can be powerful tools to enhance teaching and learning for our students -- but they're only tools. Like any machinery, technologically advanced hardware and software would only be valuable when utilized for clearly defined purposes and manned with capable individuals. This is the reason why BCS have a strong focus on professional development for all its staff, faculty, and even parents.

In collaboration with Fred Slone, our CET, we have outlined the following short term goals for BCS that we wish to fully implement in the spring:

Short Term Goals for Immediate Application

• Provide a Campus Curriculum Integration Technologist to design presentations, conduct onsite workshops, and demonstrate lessons to students and staff concurrently.
• Have a website that serves not only the staff and students of Briarmeadow but also the entire learning community and that is updated on a daily basis.
• Update software and "Deep-Freeze" all student and teacher laptops and desk tops.
• Form a STAT (student technical assistance team) to help with troubleshooting and computer upgrades.
• Get E-mail accounts for all students in grades 6-8.
• Create Podcasts of school events to be posted on our Podcast Web Site and on iTunes.
• Start a morning "Internet Cafe" for early arrivals.
• Provide monthly technology opportunities for Teachers to maintain skills.
• Create and maintain electronic portfolios on the school server for all students in grades 3-8.
• Upgrade technology in Middle School classrooms.
• Deliver online content to students via Middle School Class Web Sites.
• Have all Middle School Teachers complete an online course in digital media integration.

Monitoring of Implementation:
All Middle School teachers will complete an online weekly log that lists the date(s), the number of times the strategy they learned from the online sessions was used, and describes how the strategy was used. Teachers will also document that they are using digital media integration on their daily lesson plans. Student work samples will be posted on each class website.

Administrators will conduct regular walkthroughs to get a sense of the fidelity of the implementation of the technology standards. The CET will also provide reports to the administrators to determine the needed follow-up sessions.
Evaluation: Formative: Walkthrough data will be compared and analyzed every month. Teachers will be given feedback and follow-up sessions will be provided as needed. Summative: 2010-2011 STaR Chart Summary; Speak-Up Survey; AEIS Data

Week 4 Assignment, Part 2: Professional Development Plan

The 2008-2009 campus STaR Chart Summary for Briarmeadow Middle School reports that the school is on target in the area of Infrastructure for Technology. This is a very encouraging report. I strongly recommend that the campus capitalize on this strength to overcome its deficiencies in other domains and move all staff and faculty to “Target Technology” in all the key areas of the Texas STaR Chart by 2012.

Specifically, the STaR Chart Summary shows that in the area of Teaching and Learning, teachers need support in creating and integrating web-based lessons which include online TEKS-based content, resources, learning activities, and interactive communications that support learning objectives throughout the curriculum. In the area of Educator Preparation and Development, the majority of the teachers want to participate in professional development activities that will allow them to create and integrate web based lessons to teach content courses online. Finally, in the area of Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support, the faculty desires the campus leadership to facilitate their use of online learning and to have a collaborative technology-rich campus improvement plan that is focused on student success and grounded in research and aligned with the district strategic plan.

These findings show a very clear trend. The teachers at Briarmeadow Middle School are yearning for more online learning support from the leadership team as well as to have a strong voice in the development of a campus improvement plan which highly integrates technology into the curriculum.

Campus Professional Development Plan target for the Spring Semester, 2009-2010

Goal: Bridge the gap between the technical capabilities of staff through on-going professional developments to enhance teaching and learning and meet the demands of the global society.

Objective 1:
100% of the faculty will become familiar with the STaR Chart, Technology Applications TEKS, and the state and district Long-Range Technology plans.

PD Content: Overview of the Texas STaR Chart, Technology Applications TEKS, Texas and HISD Long-Range Technology Plans

Persons Involved: All middle school teachers – participants; Marilou Alcaraz – facilitator; principal - evaluator/monitor

Timeline: January 2010

Resources Needed: PowerPoint Presentation; No Cost

Description of Activity: Teachers will be provided with a copy of the Campus STaR Chart Summary. In groups, teachers will discuss what the data mean to them and the implication of the results to teaching and learning. Facilitator will discuss the STaR Chart information using the slide presentation. Next, teachers will explore the TEA website to learn about the technology applications and the Texas Long-Range Technology Plan. Finally, the teachers will compare the state Long-Range Plan with the district long-range plan and discuss the similarities and difference in groups.

Follow-up Activity: Teachers create the technology links to their class websites for easy access.

Objective 2: 100% of the teachers will increase their technology proficiency from “Developing Tech” to “Advanced Tech” by the end of the school year.


PD Content: Online course in digital media integration.

Persons Involved: All middle school teachers – participants; Campus Educational Technologist – facilitator; principal – evaluator/monitor

Timeline: February – March, 2010

Resources Needed: Computer Lab; $2500.00 Course Fee (Title 1 Funds)

Description of Activity: Teachers will be exposed to digital media integration by participating in an online course. Each 1.5 hours session will be conducted every early-release Friday for six consecutive weeks. The Campus Educational Technologist (CET) will provide support as needed.

Follow-up Activity: The CET will provide support to teachers while they implement what they have learned from each session. The CET will provide immediate feedback and recommendations.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Week 2 Assignment, Part 2

Teaching and Learning

The “one size fits all” method of teaching does not meet the specific needs of all learners particularly in this age of globalization. Texas educators need to consider the diverse background and experiences of our students. Instruction must be tailored to fit the needs of each and every student in our classrooms. Furthermore, all students greatly benefit when given multiple opportunities to manipulate a variety of technology devices. Having said this, students need to be exposed to rich content, communicate and collaborate with peers and experts around the world, access online instructional resources, participate in distance education, and have numerous chances to build their technology skills and knowledge.

Providing equitable education to all students is a nationwide concern. To help alleviate the issue of inequity, technology is a great equalizer. In places where local resources are limited, distance education allows schools to overcome this challenge and thus provide quality education to their students. This is one of the visions included in the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology, 2006 - 2020.

The Long-Range Plan for Technology sets boundaries and expectations for teachers and students. The days when teachers have all the information and answers are over. Digital Age requires teachers to act as facilitators, mentors, and co-learners. Students in turn become active participants of the learning process. These mental images would come to reality only when a concrete plan of action is in place. Curriculum alignment, more time to visit classrooms, and more flexibility to try new strategies are some challenges that must be conquered in order for the state to prepare students who would thrive in the 21st century and beyond.


Source:

Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020.(2007, November).
Retrieved November 25, 2009, from TEA website: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/lrpt_lrpt.html

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Week 1 Assignment, Part 4: Technology Applications TEKS Summary

Pre-K Technology Application TEKS

The technology applications domain of the Pre-K Guidelines requires educators serving this particular age group to expose their learners to a variety of technology skills and devices. These devices include but are not limited to computers, voice/sound recorders, televisions, digital cameras, and iPods. Furthermore, teachers need to ensure that students in this stage begin to understand that technology can enrich our lives. Pre-K students must gradually become self-assured and self-regulating technology-users by developing their own techniques for manipulating an assortment of age-appropriate technologies.

Specifically, the Pre-K technology applications domain outlines five expectations for this age group that need to be met by the end of Prekindergarten year. First, a successful Pre-K child should be able to open and navigate through software programs that are designed to boost the development of appropriate concepts. Additionally, he or she is expected to use and identify an array of computer input devices. Moreover, a Pre-K learner should be able operate voice/sound recorders and touch screens as well as express his or her own ideas using software applications. Finally, he or she must recognize that technology is an avenue to acquire information.

Laying the Foundation

Pre-K TEKS for technology set the groundwork for student performance in future grades. Prekindergarten students are expected to develop their capability to obtain information, solve problems, and communicate with others using age-appropriate technologies. Acquiring these skills at an early age would facilitate these students’ transition to a more formal and rigorous curriculum as they move up from one grade level to the next.

Spiraling Curriculum

When students are given multiple opportunities to master a particular skill, they are being exposed to a spiraling curriculum. Students greatly benefit from this design because students not only acquire the needed technology skill but they are allowed to become highly proficient and critical technology-users in the process. One important feature of the Technology Applications TEKS is that it is designed as a spiraling or scaffolding curriculum. To illustrate this, as early as Pre-K, students are expected to create and express own ideas using software applications. Products include own writings and drawings. This same standard applies to students in other grade levels but the degree of difficulty and sophistication gradually increases from year to year. In the primary grades, students are expected to use font attributes and graphics for a defined group of audience. Then, intermediate students build on the skills that they have previously learned to create spreadsheets and databases from a variety of sources. These same skills are employed in middle schools and high schools as they are required to perform more sophisticated tasks like creating interactive documents. From plain drawings to interactive documents using simulation and hypertext – this is tangible proof that Texas Technology Applications TEKS provide our students the needed support to move them forward to 21st Century and beyond.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Week 1 Assignment, Part 3: Analysis of the Long-Range Plan for Technology

Global economics, urgency, and societal changes necessitate the creation of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology, 2006 -2020. This comprehensive strategic plan includes four domains: Teaching and Learning; Preparation and Development; Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support; and Infrastructure for Technology. The main goal of the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology is to have a high quality, world class education for every student in Texas. According to the three-phase plan, by the year 2020, all the essential digital tools and resources would be accessible to all learners, parents, educators, and school leaders twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. This accessibility will provide all learners individualized, real-world learning experiences 24/7 that will allow them to acquire the skills and attitude of global citizens.

Teaching and learning will never be the same again as teachers become facilitators, mentors, and co-learners to guarantee that all learners will thrive in the world they will live as adults. In addition, teachers need to continuously find ways to stay abreast of the new trends in technology. Likewise, teacher preparation programs must include coursework that incorporate technology standards and how these standards relate to other core content areas. The third domain - Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support – accounts the important role district and school administrators play in ensuring that all students in the state of Texas acquire the essential technology skills needed in the 21st Century. Administrators need to personify 21st Century learners’ attributes. Finally, Infrastructure for Technology must offer safe, secure, and reliable high-speed connectivity among schools, colleges, business, homes, medical facilities, etc.

I feel empowered after reading and analyzing the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology. Knowing that the state has a concrete plan to steer its schools in the right path towards 21st Century motivates me to conquer my personal challenges. I aspire to be an asset to my school, the state, the nation, and the whole world. As an instructional leader, I have an enormous responsibility to support the state's technology initiative. This requires me to embody the attributes of a life-long learner. I cannot confidently say that I am a technologically-savvy person but I can start being one by showing my teachers and students that I take pleasure in manipulating digital tools and applications as well as learning new technology skills. To illustrate this, this course has forced me to go beyond my comfort zone, but I am learning and enjoying at the same time. This joy of learning and collaborating is I what I desire to share with my teachers and students.

Source:
Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020.(2007, November).
Retrieved November 24, 2009, from TEA website: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/lrpt_lrpt.html

Week 1 Assignment, Part 1A: Requisite Technology Skills Assessment

While I was completing the Technology Applications Inventory, I was not aware that the items included were the same TEKS for technology applications required for grades 6-8. I was actually proud of myself after finishing the inventory since I was able to honestly answer “yes” in many of the items. However, after realizing that these were the same standards expected to be mastered by eight graders I was completely abashed. How could I expect our students to become proficient technology users when I personally have not completely mastered all of these standards? I felt a surge of urgency to go back to middle school and relearn the skills that I need to possess in order to fully call myself a world class educator.

Needless to say, this revelation allowed me to reflect on my own practice as an educator and a future school administrator. Surely I cannot lead a 21st Century school with my substandard technology know how. A plan must be in order. First, I need to draw on my strengths – information acquisition and foundations – in my pursuit of educational technology competence. I have a good grip of the technology related terminologies and concepts. Additionally, the online course that I am taking at Lamar University allows me to use information acquisition skills on a daily basis. Secondly, I must continue to seek ways to improve my ability to solve problems as well as communicate using technology tools and specifications. Finally, I need to keep my eyes and ears open to all the different professional development opportunities offered inside and outside the district.

The SETDA survey was a different story. Since I do not have a formal class, I used the SETDA Building Survey. The result was very impressive. This is due to the commitment of our school administrators and teachers to provide our students with a first-rate educational experience. In 2005, my campus received a four-year $240,000 Technology Immersion Pilot grant to assist us further integrate technology into our already vigorous Middle School program. Likewise, Briarmeadow Charter School is a Reasoning Mind campus. Our fifth and sixth grade students participate in a hybrid of online and face to face math instruction. The instruction is tailored to the specific needs of each student. Another component of Reasoning Mind is to assess the effectiveness of the program. Consequently, data is used regularly to determine if technology use positively affects student achievement.

Our school is definitely a progressive environment where high student achievement is the norm. We do this by providing learner-centered instruction using technology tools to maximize our time with our students. To keep up with the demands of our technology-savvy school, I need to continue to hone my craft and stay attuned to the unique needs of our digital native learners.

Sources:

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/technology/techapp/assess/teksurv.pdf

http://www.setda-peti.org/tools.html